Islamabad – The Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) has disposed of 19 complaints of judicial misconduct during its recent meeting, taking key steps to ensure accountability and transparency within the judiciary. The proceedings, held under the leadership of Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa, were attended by senior members of the judiciary, including Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Yahya Afridi, Chief Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan of the Balochistan High Court, and Chief Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmad Khan of the Lahore High Court.
The council reviewed a total of 29 cases, out of which 19 were closed after deliberations. These included complaints that were found to lack sufficient evidence or had already been addressed through other legal forums. The remaining 10 cases are still under review and will be further examined in upcoming sessions of the council.
In a statement issued after the meeting, the SJC reaffirmed its commitment to upholding judicial integrity and maintaining public trust in the legal system. It emphasized that all complaints are dealt with according to law and based on merit, without any external influence or bias.
The meeting marked a continuation of efforts to strengthen internal mechanisms of judicial oversight. Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa stressed the importance of a transparent and accountable judiciary, stating that self-regulation within the judiciary is critical for maintaining the rule of law and public confidence in the courts.
Judicial experts have welcomed the council’s proactive approach in addressing misconduct allegations, highlighting the need for regular sessions and timely action to ensure no room for judicial complacency or impunity. Legal analysts also noted that the council’s operations have become more visible and structured under the current leadership.
The Supreme Judicial Council is a constitutional body empowered to hear complaints against judges of the superior judiciary, including the Supreme Court and high courts. It plays a pivotal role in safeguarding judicial discipline and is tasked with recommending action, including removal, in cases where judges are found guilty of misconduct.
The latest proceedings are seen as a positive signal toward internal reform and accountability in Pakistan’s judicial system, which has often faced criticism for a lack of transparency and delayed responses to complaints against sitting judges.
The council is expected to meet again later this year to review the pending complaints and to assess any new allegations that may emerge. It remains focused on ensuring that the judiciary remains independent, fair, and free from corruption or undue influence.
